|
|
Thursday, 24 April 2014
Locke and Lemonade | Days 25 & 26
Labels:
100happydays,
film,
food,
healthy eating,
instagram,
Locke,
movie,
Personal,
summer
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
The Overlooked Truth | August: Osage County Review
Rarely reviewed, little advertised and barely spoken of, August: Osage County has gone practically unnoticed in the cinemas this year. It was nominated for 25 awards, but only won 6, and those that did review it did so scathingly. But when I watched it, I was unbelievably moved. So what did I miss?
When I saw the cast list for this movie, I expected one of those all-star movies that focuses so hard on cramming celebrities into the credits that the movie is forgotten. Well, I was wrong on that count. Meryl Streep and Julia Roberts absolutely crushed their mother-daughter roles. I'd be willing to credit Roberts' performance as the role of a lifetime. She was incredible. The costars, although they get infinitely less screen time, are just as strong. There's some harrowing stuff in this film, and they handle it perfectly.
And it's not the acting that the critics lay in to [rightly not]. The Guardian published two reviews of the film, one by Mark Kermode, the other by Peter Bradshaw. Both gently slate the movie. Kermode's problem with the film is John Wells' direction, and that the audience is left feeling like "little has been gained, but much has been lost". Well, here's my problem: this film is about addiction in a fragmented family. Not to go into gory details, but anyone who has experienced either of the two will know that that's how it is: you don't gain anything from addiction, nor a broken family - you lose from it. It's not a happy ending, but you'd think that a professional film critic could handle an anti-cathartic plot. This isn't a Disney film, Kermode.
Bradshaw has a problem with the way that the "dialogue has an entropic tendency towards shouting." Where are these guys from? PSA: When people get emotional, they shout. When, like AOC's Barb, you're battling someone who is caught by addiction, and you can't get them to see sense, you shout. Screw it, you scream. It's frustrating. Would they have preferred a film where every situation was discussed quietly and democratically at the dinner table? That's not how life works, sweethearts. Wake up and smell the reality.
What the Guardian's writers seem to have in common is a shared disappointment in John Wells' direction. Bradshaw says it "doesn't add up to anything very nourishing", while his counterpart maintains that "it's hard to see how the play has benefited in the transition from stage to screen". Judging by the awards the play reaped, it's fair to say it's a good one - winning 21 awards out of 28 nominations. But Letts adapted his own screenplay, so I'm not convinced that Wells is completely to blame for any mis-translation. It seems to me that everyone's quick to jump on the director and praise the writer.
Letts' award-winning show was the mother of the new movie |
Robey, from the Telegraph, isn't so harsh on the direction; he's the only critic I've seen to criticise the writing. But wait until you hear what he's got to say. "It's a weakness of the play that the men are much less interestingly drawn than the women." I'm sorry Robey, this film is weak because the men aren't written as well as the women? If you discredit a film because the genders aren't written equally well, then there are only a handful of films in history which are worthy of praise. It's only noticeable here because we've seen a switch; the female characters are finally written better than the male. So why don't you hop of your critical horse and realise that the struggle you're feeling on behalf of the male characters is one that female characters have endured since film began.
So maybe I did miss something, but I can't say that I'm seeing things from the critics' point of view. For me, this film was a well acted piece of film which captures almost exactly what it's like to deal with addiction in a dysfunctional family. Props to everyone involved.
Last Days and Homeward Trains | Days 23 & 24
I'm back in the city of eternal rain! To be honest I'm pretty chirpy about it too. I can't pinpoint why, but this visit home felt a little weird - I think Manchester is swiftly becoming "home", and it's strange when I'm back in the south. That said, I've had some very happy days over the past week:
|
|
It wasn't a long stay in the south, but I managed to see friends and have a decent amount of free food, so mission accomplished, really. The British sun decided to grace us with its presence on Monday, so me and Lantz graced the pub with ours! Fruity cider in the sun + gossip and a catch up always equals a good day. Today, on the other hand, was groggily begun at 6:45am. An early train was definitely not what the doctor ordered, but it was a relatively calm journey with my sister, and I've even managed to migrate to the library for a few hours and whack out part of an essay since I've been back. Success!
On another note, me and Libbi are headed to get our fill of Tom Hardy (who has been sorely missed on the big screen) tomorrow in Locke, so watch out for a review. Gorgeous pics of Hardy will be included.
P.S. August: Osage County review hits DormDiary tomorrow!
On another note, me and Libbi are headed to get our fill of Tom Hardy (who has been sorely missed on the big screen) tomorrow in Locke, so watch out for a review. Gorgeous pics of Hardy will be included.
P.S. August: Osage County review hits DormDiary tomorrow!
Sunday, 20 April 2014
Banana Pancakes on Easter Weekend | Days 21 & 22
|
|
Labels:
100happydays,
easter,
food,
healthy eating,
instagram,
Personal,
Recipe
Friday, 18 April 2014
About Town | Day 19 & 20
|
|
Thursday, 17 April 2014
Ron in Real Life | Dallas Buyers' Club Review
I had a really hard time evaluating this film. The first time I watched it in the cinema, I came out completely awestruck. The second time, I was impressed. The third, and it all began to fade. Dallas Buyers' Club has been heralded by the Academy, praised by film lovers and has grossed $33.2 million. Why, then, were the critics not so loving?
Well, the Academy and the film-goers have sunk their teeth into exactly what they saw; the filming and the acting. In his review, Mark Kermode talks about the realism of the filming. He's not wrong, you know. The still camera is avoided like the plague in favour of what Kermode calls “loose-limbed” camerawork. As I've said before, I'm a fan of realist cinema, so this kind of filming really hits the spot for me. A camera which moves like a person draws a viewer in [and that's the point of a film as far as I'm concerned]. The film's cinematography is quite something, too. Yves Bélanger at the top of his game.
As for the acting, the Academy Awards said it all really, didn't they? Kermode makes quite a claim in saying that McConaughey's performance “elevate[s] this drama out of the realms of the ordinary into something quietly remarkable.” I'm not going to argue with him, he's right. In what the mob have been calling the “McConaissance”, Matthew has leapt out of the realm of the rom-com with all of his might and landed comfortably in a weightier genre. I don't usually find it easy to choose a favourite scene in a film, but there is one insanely raw shot in which McConaughey gives us the most fearful acting I've ever seen from him. If you've seen the film, you'll probably understand that I'm talking about the scene in the car on [what he believes to be] his last living day.
On the other hand, Telegraph's Tim Robey said in his review that Dallas Buyers' Club has performed a “resuscitating miracle” on the career of Jared Leto, that it's the work of his life. I wouldn't dispute for a second that it's the work of his life – after all, Fight Club didn't hand him an Oscar, did it? But the first comment makes my blood boil. Perhaps you could say that the film has resuscitated his acting career, but his career as a whole is going pretty well, I'd say. Are we ignoring his hugely successful band 30 Seconds to Mars, Robey? I think so. Apart from making a rather pretty girl, Leto rocked this role like the proverbial boat. He took a fantastic opportunity and pumped emotion into the character like Rayon pumps drugs into her arms [and legs... and feet and any other limb she can find a vein in].
The problem, then, that the critics had is probably in what the film doesn't show you. The Guardian published what is basically a revealing master post of everything that the film changed, covered over or added in, and the list isn't a short one. But it's just a film! I hear you say. True, but this is advertised as the true story of Ron Woodruff, AIDS victim and creator of the Dallas Buyers' Club. Instead, what we get is what we saw with Rush an expressionist painting of him by the ever-famous artist; Hollywood.
If we move chronologically, the first expression of “artistic license” in the film is the rodeo. The opening scene is a raunchily intimate one under the stalls at the rodeo. A rodeo that had no place at all in the real Woodruff's life. This is an add in from the writers. Some have suggested that the rodeo is a metaphor for... something, who knows what? The only benefit I can draw from it is that it drives home the “Dallas”, Texan aesthetic.
The second is the removal of Woodruff's girlfriend, and the apparent sex change of his doctor. It seems that his girlfriend and his doctor were merged into one character, but why? Simple: the Hollywood flirtation factor. Every box-office hit needs a romantic subplot after all. [Or maybe it was to make rom-com McCon more comfortable with the script!]
The third, and most disconcerting is the liberty with which the writers portray Woodruff. The Hollywood Ron seems to be a twisted caricature: he's very texan, very homophobic, very 'masculine', very sleezy, very offensive, and violently alcoholic. In fact, what does he share with the real Ron? A haircut and a life-threatening disease, and that's about as far as it goes. Oh wait, the Buyers' Club, too. He wasn't a rodeo-goer, he wasn't single, and apparently he wasn't homophobic. Some of his friends have even said they wouldn't be surprised if he had been bisexual himself. Not exactly the player we see in the film.
So there it is. This film is fiction posing as truth. Inspired by Ron Woodruff's life, not an account of it. We've seen this with almost every historical drama in the industry; the truth is dressed up to be entertaining.The Baader Meinhof Komplex [Uli Edel, 2008] is guilty of a similar crime – disguising historical figures as celebrities for entertainment value. It's a eternal problem: entertainment versus accuracy. To be honest, I don't think that the historical account is suitable for the screen. If you have to sacrifice reality, it's not a reliable way to convey meaning.
That's not to say this isn't a good film. It's to say it isn't an accurate one. Like I said, I loved the film and could watch it to the death, but I will have a hard time forgiving it for the liberties it's taken. And for the effect it's had on the once beautiful McConaughey's physique, but that's another matter all together.
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
Cityscapes and Skyrises | Day #16 to 18
|
|
|
Labels:
100happydays,
instagram,
Manchester,
Personal,
snippet,
sunset,
travel,
University,
Vienna
Sunday, 13 April 2014
Progress (finally) | Day #15
Saturday, 12 April 2014
Glorious Food | Days #13 & 14
|
|
Thursday, 10 April 2014
Absence, Signs and Sun | Days 11 & 12
The first made me chuckle; I tend to notice grammatical mistakes because of my degree, and I'm always astonished to see that these things don't get checked. The second is my dorm room here; the light flows in really nicely just as the sun peaks in the sky.
Until next time,
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
Out of Town | Day #10
Didsbury |
Manchester isn't exactly a notoriously beautiful city, but its surrounding towns are great. Didsbury isn't far from the city center, but it's one of the cutest towns I've seen in a while. I just wish I was rich enough to live there!
Monday, 7 April 2014
On Stationery and Becoming Stationary | Happy Day #9
Leatherbound from Globetrotter | Kraft from Paperchase |
Sunday, 6 April 2014
Red Sky at Night | Day 8
Red sky at night? |
I was outside my flat just as the sun was setting, and the sky was bright orange. I make an effort to look at the sky more often, and this is why. Beautiful, right?
Until tomorrow,
Saturday, 5 April 2014
Egg Free, Effort Free | Happy Day #7
The rather attractive result of our experiments in Vienna |
...
I also recommend putting the flour and cocoa through a sieve so that you avoid lumps |
See what I mean? It looks uncooked, but it's actually cake under all that shine! |
Until tomorrow,
Friday, 4 April 2014
Squats, Soup and the Sixth | More Happy Days
Take care sweeties.
Thursday, 3 April 2014
Pretty Presents | The Fifth Happy Day
Don't worry - I haven't forgotten the fifth day. Here's today's dose of happiness:
I'll admit that I'm a bit of a tea junkie. I've got a box full of herbal teas in my kitchen cupboard and I've been known to receive boxes of foreign tea from pen pals. My sister, being the wonderful person she is, showed up at my flat with this gorgeous present today. That's a cutsie floral mug, chocolate chip cookies, a sachet of English Breakfast tea (yum!) and a tea egg for loose leaf teas. She knows me too well!
Five down, 95 to go!
Stars and Strikes | Starred Up Film Review
As promised, film reviews! A couple of weeks ago I saw the new Brit-Grit drama Starred Up on the big screen. I'm a huge fan of raw British dramas (This is England and A Clockwork Orange being the obvious examples), so I'm critical whenever a new one hits the cinemas. Here's what I thought of the Film 4's new cockney convict film.
Following Eric Love - a “starred up” 19-year old young offender - as he makes a transition from juvenile detention to an adult penitentiary, David Mackenzie’s new drama is an intensely graphic account of the British Prison system.
Starred up Eric goes from being a leader in Juvi to an underdog Adult Pen. |
First things first, credit where credit’s due: Mackenzie and his cinematographer Michael McDonough need to be applauded for the astonishing aesthetic here. What’s best about it is how subtle it is - it’s not showy, there aren’t any frills, and most people will go the entire film without noticing it. That’s what makes it so fitting. The entire film is raw, and the shooting joins in with that element seamlessly.
As for performances, it’s worth an all-round applause. The cast is crammed with fantastic supporting actors, perfectly chosen for a movie this gritty. Rupert Friend fits into the cast nicely as an out-of-place voluntary therapist; Sam Spruell plays the textbook baddie as the Deputy Governor; and Ben Mendelsohn gives a truly incredible performance as Neville Love - a father struggling with his relationship with his son (his character development also involves a poetic little twist). And leading them all in the performance of a lifetime is Jack O’Connell as Eric Love. He’s indescribable, so I’ll start a new paragraph.
O’Connell has always played a rough-around-the-edges kid; the mouthy Pukey in This is England (2006), bad-boy Cook in Skins, and Marky in Harry Brown (2009) being his more notable performances. Eric Love might measure up to these roles in an aesthetic sense, and share Cook’s strife with his dear old Dad, but he shoots past them all in terms of emotional depth and character development. O’Connell has been truly lucky with Starred Up in having a writer like Jonathan Asser (who based the script on his experience volunteering at HM Prison Wandsworth) who could portray the character in a way so close to true life that it’s impossible not to feel for him. The flawless writing, combined with O’Connell’s breathtaking ability to play a role as if the script was based on his own life, creates a character which is indisputably moving scene to scene. But maybe it’s just because he’s gorgeous, who knows?
A final tip of the hat to the realism of the movie. As far as prison movies go, there is a potential to royally bugger up and portray the justice system as some kind of Clockwork Orange descendant, or to hit the nail so precisely on the head that the work will resonate for years (I’m talking Hunger, Bronson (both 2008) etc.) Starred Up might not share the historical value of these two, but it’s undoubtedly in the same league. Filmed principally in HM Prison Maze in Northern Ireland, where the infamous hunger strikes of 1981 took root, the grit in the movie literally seeps through the walls. It’s this setting - Prison Maze - which makes the comparison to Steve McQueen’s Hunger (based on the hunger strikes in Maze) so appropriate. That’s not to say they are identical, or even hugely similar - it’s the fact that they are so dissimilar which is great. Where McQueen focused on the history, the precise moment, Mackenzie gives a timeless and ever-true account of the inmate’s time. What they do share is an astounding open-wound style.
All in all, nothing less than you’d expect from Film 4.
Labels:
film,
film review,
jack o'connell,
review,
screen,
starred up
Wednesday, 2 April 2014
DormDiary's Back | Easter Resurrection
Long time no see, right? You'll have to forgive me, the dorm lifestyle has been a little relentless lately - eat, sleep, slave, repeat seems to be my new motto. After a seven-month-long hiatus, I think it's time for a much-needed update on the DormDiary.
Since September last year I've started University, put a deposit on a house, passed January exams, and been buried under piles of revision for the upcoming summer exams. But not that much has really changed. I still spend time I should be working watching films and TV shows instead; and I still spend far too much time on the internet (she writes on her blog - how ironic). After a healthy dose of reflection, I decided that the only thing that was really wrong with this kind of procrastination is that it's not productive. But how do you make procrastination productive? Isn't this the eternal problem of every internaute?
And then I found this little gem.
100happydays is a challenge spread across various social media sites which aims to make users, internet-wide, see the beauty in life. How? It's pretty simple actually: you just have to post a photo each day for - you guessed it - 100 days, of things that make you happy. And because you go looking for things to take pictures of every day, you realise just how many little things make you happy. According to their manifesto, people who completed the challenge even began receiving more compliments and falling in love easier. And as a bonus, if you complete the challenge they'll send you a book of your 100 happy photos. Pretty rad huh? Now that's productive procrastination.
Wait a minute, is this even relevant? It might not seem it, but it is applicable. 100happydays has made me think hard about what really makes me happy. When it came down to it, it turned out to be mainly film & TV, travel, and reading (original, right?). So if I take what makes me happy, and add my method of procrastination (vigorous internetting), then surely it will be easier to make that procrastination productive? That's the theory. Now I just need to put it to the test, and here's how.
From here on out, I'm going to post my 100happydays photos (which you can find on my Instagram) right here to DormDiary. Where does film fit in? TV? Reading? Well, the posts here are going to be extended versions of my hundred happy days. That means reviews of films, TV show theories, travel photos - paying attention to what makes me happy, not just snapping pictures of it. C'est parti!
To make up for lost time, here are the pictures of my first four happy days
See you tomorrow for my fifth, sweeties!
...
See you tomorrow for my fifth, sweeties!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)